However, Justice William Young dissented from the majority decision, finding that Mr Johnson defrauded the franchisees and conferred a windfall benefit on Mrs Johnson with the practical effect of defeating his creditors.

• 上诉庭以2：1支持约翰逊太太的上诉请求，持异议的大法官则认为约翰逊先生诈欺了债权人然后天上掉馅饼式地将财产转移到他太太名下，这实际上已经达到了击垮债权人的效果。