您要查找的是不是:
- His argument seems logical. 他的论据似乎合逻辑。
- None of his arguments seemed to me to hold water. 在我看来他的观点没有一个是站得住脚的。
- His argument is logical and hard to fault. "他的论据逻辑严密,无懈可击。"
- His arguments seemed shallow and tedious. 他的论点显得浅薄乏味。
- The upside of delayed publication, if there is one, is that his arguments seem more compelling now - and people are less likely to view him as a crackpot counter-culturalist. 如果非得说他延迟出版该书的好处,那便是他的观点现在看起来是如此的引人注目,使人有种逼迫感,而且人们也不大可能再把洛西克夫视为一个反主流文化的怪人。
- There's no logic in his argument. 他的论据不合逻辑。
- The interruption fragmented his argument. 他的辩论因被打断而显得不完整。
- I had to grant the reasonableness of his argument. 我必须承认他的论点有道理。
- This non sequitur invalidates his argument. 他不根据前提推理因而论证无效。
- His argument does not make sense. 他的争论没有意义。
- Her article brilliantly demolishes his argument. 她的文章精辟地批驳了他的论点。
- I fail to see the logic behind his argument. 我不明白支持他论据的是什么逻辑。
- I was able to refute his argument. 我能驳倒他的论点。
- From one point of view, this seems logical. 从理论上讲是没错。
- I had to grant the logic of his argument. 我不得不姑且相信他的论点合乎逻辑。
- Your argument seemed not very persuasive. 你的论据不太有说服力。
- You have to accept the logic of his argument. 应该承认他的论据中有逻辑性.
- Your argument seems to have too many ifs. 你的论据似乎假设太多了一些。
- It was easy to pick holes in his argument. 在他的论据里不难找到漏洞。
- Of course, this argument seems a sophistry. 当然,这样的说法有狡辩之嫌。