The results show that NLCGM(1,1) is more accurate than the traditional CGM(1,1) and the quadratic equation. The average absolute deviations of NLCGM(1,1), CGM(1,1) and quadratic equation are 0.016 , 0.033 and 0.056, respectively.
英
美
- 经验证，计算值与实验值相吻合，获得了较常规CGM（1，1）模型和二次方程更高的精度，平均绝对误差为0.；016，而常规CGM（1，1）模型和二次方程的平均绝对误差分别为0
